Teen Pregnancy Is A Convenient Excuse - 1152 Words

Teen pregnancy is often seen as a mistake, however blaming teen pregnancy on one or two things or person doesn’t resolve the solution. Teen pregnancy is something that affects millions of young teens in the United States. For some , these pregnancies are planned but majority of teen pregnancy is unplanned. Teen pregnancy causes a lot of endless problems in the lives of the teen and the newborn child. According to the article â€Å" Blaming TV for Teen Pregnancy Is A convenient excuse† by Schroeder â€Å"We need to spend more time talking with young people, at home, at school, in religious communities - and yes, even in the media - about sex and sexuality in ways that help them understand and believe that they have a choice: the choice to be teens before becoming teen parents.† Neither the media content or country should be blamed for the influence of teen pregnancy. The rate of teenage pregnancy in the United States is often blamed on social media, whoever this is not the case. According to Elizabeth Schroeder’s article Blaming TV For Teen Pregnancy Is A Convenient Excuse† she states reasons for the world to be skeptical â€Å"whenever any research claims that there’s a direct cause and effect relationship between one thing such as television viewing, and something as complex as teenage pregnancy. Elizabeth Schroeder`s also stated that â€Å" Regardless of what is in the media adults need to be educating young people earlier about sexuality and sexual health,† so they make the rightShow MoreRelatedAttention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder: To Medicate or Not to Medicate?2369 Words   |  10 Pagesclassroom and a child with Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder often gets into trouble at school and/or home. If not recognized early this child now categorized, as a â€Å"trouble maker† becomes a frustrated, unde rachiever with low self-esteem. These teen have a higher rate of substance use and as adults can find themselves with a history of failed relationships and frequently under or unemployed (Addresources.org). Diagnosis of this behavioral disorder is a several step process. There is no singleRead MoreFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 PagesRecruiting Minorities and Women 60 Adverse Impact 61 Chapter 4 Employee Rights and Discipline 84 Learning Outcomes 84 Introduction 86 What Other Laws Affect Discrimination Practices? 61 Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 62 The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 62 viii Contents Employee Rights Legislation and the HRM Implications 86 The Privacy Act of 1974 86 The Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1974 87 The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 87 The Polygraph Protection ActRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesoffer 86 CHAPTER 1 DEVELOPING SELF-AWARENESS 2. A consumer advocate organization conducted a survey to determine whether Wendy’s hamburgers were really any more â€Å"hot and juicy† than any other hamburgers. After testing a Big Mac, a Whopper, a Teen Burger, and a Wendy’s Hot and Juicy, each hamburger brand received approximately the same number of votes for being the juiciest. The consumer group advocated that Wendy’s not advertise its hamburgers to be the juiciest. The company indicated that

Helping Others Ian in Shattered by Eric Walters Essay Example For Students

Helping Others: Ian in Shattered by Eric Walters Essay â€Å"I looked anxiously. I didn’t see anybody†¦ I’d keep my head up and my eyes open-`You got a smoke to spare?’† (Walters 3) In Shattered, Eric Walters hauls the reader through the life of Ian, the protagonist who experiences the joy of helping others. Throughout the white pine award novel, Ian is continually helping people around him realize that their life isn’t perfect and they ought to alter it somewhat. Furthermore, the author carefully compares the significance of family and how importance they are to everyone’s life. Right through the book, Eric Walters demonstrates the theme of compassion through the use of Ian helping Jack overcome his drinking problems, showing Berta the value of patriot and always there for the less fortunate. All humans have their sufferings and Jack is no expectation, he has problems with drinking depression and denial. Once Ian realized this, he reassured him and tried to ease away the pain. This is shown in the book when Ian stated to Jack â€Å"It’s just that I think you should stop drinking.†(Walters 166) Ian likewise said that if Jack could stop drinkin.

John D. Rockefeller

Introduction John D. Rockefeller made one of the most influential decisions of monopolizing the petroleum industry. John D. Rockefeller was born at Richford in New York in 1839. He lived a humble life and while still young, he used to sell candy. Additionally, he could make money by giving the neighbors loans.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on John D. Rockefeller – Standard Oil Monopoly specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More At around the age of sixteen years, he was employed as a bookkeeper receiving fifty cents in a day (Gunderman and Gregory 1). In 1859, he collaborated with Maurice B. Clark and started a wholesale business followed by an oil refinery after including Samuel Andrews in the business. As the demand for oil increased, Rockefeller bought the refinery from his partners after borrowing money. Later, he bought as well as build other oil companies. In 1870, John D. Rockefeller collaborated with his brot her and established the Standard Oil Company at Ohio. Standard Oil Company gave John D. Rockefeller the strength of driving away other owners of refineries by procuring their business premises (Baylor 1). At around 1880, the Standard Oil Company was refining approximately ninety percent of the United States oil. The company controlled all the oil refining processes and marketing procedures in the United States. As a result, John D. Rockefeller had a strong influence on the quality of oil products produced and the market price. In 1890, John D. Rockefeller retired as the president of the company and Theodore replaced him. During the reign of Theodore, he initiated antitrust actions, which led to the collapse of Standard Oil Company into other small companies. According to Gunderman and Gregory, John D. Rockefeller survived in the business environment because of monopoly (1). Monopoly is a Greek word meaning alone or single. Monopoly exists when a particular business enterprise is the only supplier of a specific commodity (Baylor 1). The characteristic of monopoly is absence of competition to produce that commodity and a viable alternative product.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More As a result, monopoly has a significant market power and it usually control the prices of commodities. For instance, monopoly can increase the profit margin by producing goods in small quantities and selling them at higher prizes. Standard Oil Company was a monopoly. John D. Rockefeller used unethical business practices to monopolize Standard Oil Company. The Six Unethical Practices of John D. Rockefeller Reducing the Prices of Oil and Its Products John D. Rockefeller reduced the prices of oil and its products temporarily (Baylor 4). His competitors could not keep up with the reduced prices because they had not planned for the same. As a result, most of the business people who w ere dealing with oil and oil products ventured in to other types of enterprises. Those who could not survive in the competitive business environment sold their enterprises to Standard Oil Company. The lower prices of oil attracted many consumers, hence, Standard Oil Company managed to establish a strong customer base. According to the theory of economics, low prices more often than not reduce the profit margin of a business and can even make it collapse. John D. Rockefeller was not interested in the profit, but in monopolizing Standard Oil Company by driving away his competitors. He managed to stabilize Standard Oil Company at the expense of the profit. F or instance, between 1880 and 1890, the price of processing raw oil dropped by one cent while that of refined oil by twenty six cents per gallon (Baylor 3).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on John D. Rockefeller – Standard Oil Monopoly specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page L earn More By cutting down the prices of oil, John D. Rockefeller did not only win local consumers but also the international traders. Baylor stated that, in order for the Standard Oil Company to compete with the Russian Oil in the Asian and European Countries, John D Rockefeller subsidized the foreign prices of oil (5). Additionally, he supplied free products in order to establish a universal customer base. For instance, in 1870, Standard Oil Company supplied kerosene lamps to the interior parts of the globe and taught people how to use them. Procuring the Components Required Making Oil Barrels John D. Rockefeller purchased the components required to make oil barrels and as a result, his competitors were unable to transport their oil to the consumers (Baylor 3). This is because his competitors could not change the raw oil into refined products that the customers can consume. Thus, Standard Oil Company was the major supplier of refined oil products and it gained fame all over the w orld. With time, Standard Oil Company started producing barrels and selling them at a reduced price in order to attract many consumers (Baylor 3). For instance, John D Rockefeller was selling a barrel at one point five dollar while external suppliers were distributing at a price of two point five. This difference of one dollar facilitated the monopoly of Standard Oil Company because it attracted many consumers. Secret Deals with Railroad The major advantage of Standard Oil Company was its ability to get reduced rates from the railroads. John D. Rockefeller used the fame and prestige of Standard Oil Company to form an alliance with railroads, which gave it rebates in privacy (Baylor 4). Hence, the railroads reduced the shipping charges of Standard Oil Company.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The reduced prices enabled the standard oil company to compete effectively with other business enterprises that were charged high rates for the shipping. Some business enterprises could not cope up with the competition and they allowed the Standard oil to be a monopoly. John D Rockefeller secured special considerations from railroads via giving them some amounts of oil. For example, John D. Rockefeller used to give railroads sixty carloads of oil every day in favor of shipment from other oil businesses (Baylor 3). Railroads could carry oil from Standard Oil Company only instead of collecting supplementary products from other oil refinery companies. As a result, Standard Oil Company dominated the market by interfering with the supply chain management of other small refinery companies. John D. Rockefeller won his railroads consumers by building an oil loading facility next to the train station, renting his oil tanker and taking responsibility for any accident on a property that belong ed to railroad (Baylor 4). This allowed Standard Oil Company outdo Pittsburgh Refineries because they could not receive any discount from railroads. Therefore, standard Oil Company managed to monopolize the market by maintaining reduced prices. Buying Competitors Secretly Gunderman and Gregory stated that John D. Rockefeller borrowed money and bought other oil refinery companies in secret (2). He then sent some of the workers from the procured company to find out the business deals of other oil refinery companies. John D. Rockefeller used the report of the findings to take caution against a competitive business deal. For instance, if an oil company plans to reduce the price of oil products, Standard Oil Company would lower their prices further. Some competitors that John D. Rockefeller had bought established oil companies and other refineries joined them. The aforementioned business development created competition with the Standard Oil Company. As a result, John D. Rockefeller secre tly hired the managers of the competitors companies and gave them high pay so that they do not produce any oil product (Baylor 2). The refineries that produced small amount of oil maintained an expensive skeleton team. Standard Oil Company acquired approximately ninety percent of the refining industries. In order to facilitate monopoly, John D. Rockefeller secretly bought dominating oil refinery companies but did not change their names to standard oil company. For instance, Baylor stated that John D. Rockefeller bought Creek Oil Company in Pennsylvania but he did not change the name to Standard Oil Company (5). As a result, the workers of Standard Oil Company and Creek Oil worked collaboratively. The sales of Standard Oil increased because customers who were against the company were still buying the oil because they thought it belonged to Creek Oil Company. Buying or Creating Other Companies That Sell Oil Related Products John D Rockefeller created companies that sell oil related pr oducts like pipelines as well as engineering firms that operated independently but gave Standard Oil Company rebates. In 1879, Standard Oil Company became a monopoly in the oil transport industry after John D. Rockefeller created an oil pipeline company (Baylor 3). Although Tidewater Pipe Line Company tried to compete with Standard Oil, it did not succeed. This is because John D. Rockefeller bought an exclusive chatter to construct its industry where Tidewater Company had planned to build one. As a result, Tidewater Company entered into an agreement with the Standard Oil Company so that they could survive in the competitive business environment. Since Standard Oil Company had control over the market, it restricted the pipeline business activities of Tidewaters to eleven point five percent and retained the remaining percentage. Standard Oil Company managed to form secret collaboration with the South Improvement Company. Thus, South Improvement Company proposed the secret cartels of t he Standard Oil Company and gave them rebates while raising the charges for the other refineries industries (Baylor 2). On the other hand, the South Improvement Company used to get rebates from other oil refinery industries as well as information about the prices of their products. John D. Rockefeller would be given the abovementioned information and he was able to regulate the oil prices and underpin his competitors. Moreover, Standard Oil Company used to ship their barrel on the Standard Oil Company railroad in exchange of a discount of forty cents per barrel. As people became aware of the dirty games of John D. Rockefeller in the oil industry, he had already acquired twenty two out of twenty six of his competitors in Cleveland. Use of Thugs John D. Rockefeller used thugs to coerce competitors who could not be persuaded to collaborate with him. Ida Tarbell, an European competitor tried to attack Standard Oil Company by arraigning the impact of John D. Rockefeller on other oil refi nery companies. When John D. Rockefeller realized the mission of Tarbell, he tried to engage him in an agreement. Tarbell refused and John D. Rockefeller send the owners of small refinery companies to destroy his oil pump and well by burning or smashing them (Baylor 3). The aforementioned tactic ensured that standard Oil Company remained a monopoly. The Net Worth of John D Rockefeller and Carlos Slim Helà º John D Rockefeller net worth was six hundred and sixty three point four billion dollars as of February (Ash 171). He got his money from oil businesses. He operated standard oil company for twenty seven years before retiring in i897. He is the founder of Rockefeller and Chicago universities. He was generous and supported tertiary institutions like Harvard, Yale and Columbia.John D. Rockefeller founded the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and the Education Board in order to increase the opportunity of people to learn. He was a philanthropist. Carlos Slim Helà º is the r ichest person in the world with a net worth of sixty nine billion dollars (Ash 171). He gets his money from his telecommunication, retail and mining business enterprises. Some of them include Conglomerate, Telmex and Grupo Carso. He is the chief executive of Telmex. Every one dollar that each person in Mexico spent, twenty cents belongs to Helà º. It is predicted that in the next five year, the net worth of Helà º will increase by approximately thirty billion dollars if he maintain the same race. Conclusion John D. Rockefeller made one of the most influential decisions of monopolizing the petroleum industry. He used unethical business practices to monopolize the Standard Oil Company. On the other hand, he was generous and made sure that he donated ten percent of his dues every month. He is the richest man that has ever lived with a net worth of sixty three point four billion dollars as of February. Works Cited Ash, Russell. Top Ten of Everything. Oxford: Oxford Publishers, 2006. P rint. Baylor, Christopher. â€Å"The Life of John D. Rockefeller.† Education Humanities 3.4 (2001): 1-6. Print. Gunderman, Richard and Matthews Gregory. â€Å"Educating Leaders: Insight fron John D. Rockefeller.† Academic Radiology 1.1 (2012): 1-3. Print. This essay on John D. Rockefeller – Standard Oil Monopoly was written and submitted by user Joslyn Carver to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Return on Assets What It Is and How to Use It

Return on Assets What It Is and How to Use It SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips The business world is full of acronyms, and keeping them all straight can be tough. What is Return on Assets, also known as ROA? Read on to learn exactly what ROA is, how you can use the ROA formula to calculate it, how ROA relates to similar financial ratios, and, most importantly, what you can learn about the success and future of a company from its ROA. What Is Return on Assets? Return on assets (sometimes known as Return on total assets) is a financial ratio that tells how much profit a company can generate from its assets. Successful businesses are able to earn more money from their assets, and ROA tells you how well a business is doing that. In general, the higher the ROA, the better the company is doing because higher ROAs indicate a company is more effectively using its assets to generate profits. In other words, they’re earning more money on less investment. How Do You Calculate Return on Assets? Return on assets is calculated as the ratio of the company’s net income to its average total assets. Net income (also known as net profit) is the amount of total revenue remaining after accounting for all expenses. Total assets are all the resources a company owns that have economic value. Here’s the ROA formula: ROA = Net Income à · Average Total Assets For example, if a company has $20,000 in total assets and generates $2,000 in net income, the return on assets calculator tells you that its ROA would be $2,000 / $20,000 = 0.1 or 10%. An ROA of 10% means the company earned $0.10 for every $1 it has in assets. What Does ROA Tell You? The return on assets ratio is a way to determine how well a company is performing. It shows how well a company can convert the money used to purchase assets into profits. As mentioned above, higher ROAs are generally better because they show the company is efficiently managing its assets to produce more net profits. In general, an ROA over 5% is considered good. However, ROA can vary by industry, so instead of comparing one company’s ROA to a completely different company’s ROA to try to see which one is doing better, you’ll get more accurate data by comparing one company’s current ROA to its past ROA or to the ROA of another company in the same field. Here are the ROAs of several well-known companies. Notice how much they vary from each other. You could compare the ROA of Facebook to the ROA of Snap (Snapchat’s parent company) and say pretty confidently that Facebook provides a better return on assets than Snap because the difference (23.97% vs -40.62%) is so great and also because they’re in the same industry. However, you shouldn’t compare to ROA of Facebook with, say, the ROA of McDonald's because the two are in completely different industries. The data below is the ROA of each company from October through December 2018, and it comes from Macrotrends. Facebook: 23.97% McDonald's: 18.50% Target: 7.03% Exxon: 6.08% Snap: -40.62% New York Times: 6.36% General Motors: 4.25% Tesla: -3.42% Additionally, keep in mind that ROA isn’t a surefire way to gauge how well a company is doing because, like any other single financial value, it doesn’t include the whole picture. For example, companies with large initial investments will typically have lower ROAs, even if they’re doing well. Knowing additional financial ratios of a company will give you a better idea of how well it's doing compared to just looking at its ROA alone. We discuss two other key financial ratios in the next section. How Is ROA Different From ROE or ROI? Like ROA, Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Investment (ROI) are ratios used to measure the performance of businesses. Understanding the differences between the three will help you get a more complete view of how well a company is doing and how different factors are impacting its success. ROA vs ROE Both ROA and ROE measure how a company uses its resources. However, ROE only measures the return on a company’s equity and doesn’t account for a company’s debt. ROA does include the company’s debt. The more debt a company takes on, the higher its ROE will be relative to its ROA, and if a company has no debt, its ROE would equal its ROA. Here’s the formula for Return on Equity: ROE = Net Income à · Shareholder Equity Both ROA and ROE have net income in the numerator, but ROE has shareholder equity in the denominator. Shareholder equity = assets - liabilities. That inclusion of liabilities is the difference between ROE and ROA (ROA only has assets in the denominator). Investors typically use both values to determine how well a company is doing. The ROE value shows how effectively investments are generating income, while ROA shows how effectively the company’s assets are being used to generate income. ROA vs ROI ROI evaluates the impacts investments have had on a company during a defined period. Here’s the ROI formula: ROI = (Earnings - Initial Investment) à · Initial Investment Because assets and profitability of businesses can vary widely across industries, ROA is typically only useful for comparing similar companies within the same industry. ROI, however, can be used to compare companies in different industries because analysts can use ROI values to determine which company, in any industry, will return the most profits if they choose to invest in it. Summary: Return on Assets Ratio The return on assets ratio is a way to tell how much profit a company can generate from its assets. The ROA formula is: ROA = Net Income à · Average Total Assets The return on assets formula is one useful way to measure a company’s success, and, in general, the higher the ROA, the better. However, don’t rely exclusively on ROA to determine if a company is doing well, and don’t compare the ROAs of companies in different industries, since difference industries typically have different average ROAs. What's Next? Working on a research paper but aren't sure where to start?Then check out our guide, where we've collected tons ofhigh-quality research topicsyou can use for free. Want to know the fastest and easiest ways to convert between Fahrenheit and Celsius? We've got you covered! Check out our guide to the best ways to convert Celsius to Fahrenheit (or vice versa). Are you learning about logarithms and natural logs in math class?We have a guide on all the natural log rules you need to know.

Financial risks Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Financial risks - Essay Example Transaction exposure is linked with the future gain or loss which the company will be making related to future obligation settlements. To handle transitional risk, company goes for different hedging techniques, but hedging if more profitable in the short terms as compared to long term (Shim, Shim & Siegel, 2008, pp 365). Economic exposure is the most sensitive exposure because its effect is far broader as compared to the others. The extent to which economic exposure will affect a company depends on nature of the company or the industry in which company is. These economic factors can be macro economic factors which have their impact world wide or can be micro economic factors like socio-economic factors or political factors specifically to a particular country (Shim, Shim & Siegel, 2008, pp 365). The main motto of any organization is to reduce cost of production and to increase profit for the stakeholders. As through marketing, the management tries to increase revenue, so such strategies are being made through which BMW can increase their sale in those countries where currency is appreciating or is over valued and they will restructure their marketing plan for the countries where currency is depreciating or are undervalued. Same strategy is adopted while launching new product into market; BMW introduces its new products when currencies are appreciating so that they can collect revenue as high as possible. Thus the process is more or less like a long term call option. BMW remain highly cautious for finalizing their marketing expenditure. Company always keeps in mind that marginal expenditure made on any unit should be less than the marginal profit per unit. Strategy for production is just the reverse of marketing strategy as the company always tries to lower down production cost as far as possible. BMW expands its production capacity

How ares of contract law, specifically pre-marital agreements are Essay

How ares of contract law, specifically pre-marital agreements are affected from a feminist perspective Discuss in light of Radm - Essay Example Some legal feminists push for the equal application of laws to both men and women. Others believe that the law and the courts must take extra steps to favour women over men considering that women are, by definition and in reality, placed at a lower stratum than men in society. This clash of perspectives may even be more pronounced in the days to come with the recent Supreme Court decision in Radmacher v Granatino,1 an English premarital agreement case. This case does not only reverse previous decisions of courts in prenuptial agreements by conferring a rebuttable presumption on such agreements but it breaks the stereotypical image of wealthy men enforcing premarital agreements against economically vulnerable women spouses. The implication of the sweeping application of the legal dictum of Radmacher in future cases is to deprive women spouses, generally perceived to be the less economically viable partner, of court intervention and assistance in prenuptial agreements where such agreem ents contain provisions disadvantageous to women. The Feminist Legal Theory The feminist legal theory emerged in the 1970s and, as with any other feminist movement, was driven by the perception that men dominate and shape society, which itself subordinates women to men. Feminists bewailed that legal systems render decisions with underlying assumptions about gender, therefore, justifying and further institutionalising gender inequality. Such gender assumptions, according to them, can be gleaned in decisions that take into account and were influenced by essentially gender-related factors. It had been argued by some feminist movements that it was not nature that subordinates women in a sphere of domesticity, but culture aided by the courts with the latter’s restrictive decisions against women such as prohibiting married women to own or dispose property.2 Feminist legal movements, however, approaches their battle from diverse perspectives, some of which are complementary, whilst others are plainly conflicting. Nonetheless, all feminist legal models blame the legal and judicial systems in perpetuating gender hierarchy. The liberal equality model insisted that men and women should be treated alike in all respects. This model insists on the â€Å"sameness† between men and women in arriving at rational choices and seeks to dispute the perception that women are inferior to men, and should therefore, be accorded the same legal treatment as men. This means that even favour accorded to women because of their sex violates equality because it results in the differentiation of women and men.3 This model was, however, eventually assailed as weak because of its failure to take into account real and actual differences between the sexes such as pregnancy in the employment area. On the other hand, the radical feminist model emphasises the differences between the sexes and rallies the legal system to give special treatment to women. Contrary to the liberal equality m odel, the radical feminist model compels the law to highlight such differences and accord relief to women to bridge the gap of inequality that separates them from men. Radical feminists believe that women are subjugated to the state and to men all of the time and are therefore, disempowered. Radical feminist legalists subscribe to the ideas of Catherine MacKinnon, Sylvia Law and Nan Hunter: MacKinnon regarded women’s sexual submission to men as false consciousness of individuals who are inherently oppressed, and; Law

Module Summaries Essay Example for Free

Module Summaries Essay Module 1 introduced the concept of evidence-based practice by describing how research reports are adapted and incorporated into healthcare practices. Research plays an essential role in identifying the best methods in diagnosing, treating and caring for patients with particular medical disorders. Evidence-based practice is based on the testing of experimental treatment regimens to a study population and determining its effect on the patient. It is therefore important that the investigators of a clinical trial be highly analytical and cautious with regards to the design, implementation and assessment of research programs and results. The module also instructs its reader on methods in identifying investigations that are of good quality. The significance and credibility of the research study is also important in any medical investigation. The process of appraising a medical investigation should thus always include screening a research design based on the feasibility, credibility and repeatability of the study. Module 2 describes the impact of research on shaping healthcare practices based on evidence-based research. In addition, the module provides methods on how to conduct a thorough analysis of a research report based on an assessment tool. The criteria of evaluating research studies is generally based on the employment of a rating scale which looks into different aspects of a study, including the aims, hypotheses and methodology of the research. The ethical issues of the clinical study are also important aspects to consider in any health-related investigation. It is thus important to review the reasons why particular investigators conducted a study, without inflicting any additional harm on the study subjects and still continuing in promoting excellence in healthcare delivery to the public. Evidence-based research thus forms an integral part of healthcare because it provides scientific proof that a certain procedure or treatment is indeed effective and beneficial to the target patient population.